Supreme Court 20th April, 2018.
Justices: Olabode Rhodes-Vivour, JSC, Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili, JSC
John Inyang Okoro, JSC, Amiru Sanusi, JSC, Ejembi Eko, JSC
Subject Matter(s):
The Doctrine Binding Whether or Not Purchaser Had Notice of Pending Proceedings
The Doctrine Applies Only to Real Property Not to Personal Property
The Doctrine Applies Irrespective of Notice, Actual or Constructive
Deemed and Actual Grant – Land Use Act
Validity of Service of Notice to Quit Shorter Than The Statutorily Required Period
Validity of Service of Notice to Quit Longer Than the Statutorily Required Period
Effect of Unilateral Increase by a Landlord of the Rent Payable by a Tenant
On Who Can Issue a Valid Notice to Quit
Ground(s) of appeal
Recovery of premises
Competent witness
Service of court process(es)
Mesne profit
Competence of court
Interference with concurrent finding(s) of fact(s)
Admission/admitted fact(s)
Final Order: Appeal Dismissed.